The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
Explanation:
African Americans came back as liberators
Women worked when the men fought
Japanese Americans were sent to internment camps, wrongfully suspected as potential traitors
Answer: The outlook that the arts and physics share within the 1920s was the thought of uncertainty. This was due to the previous war.
they promoted a voilent socail revolutions
