1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Norma-Jean [14]
3 years ago
7

Would you say that early hunting/gathering cultures were based more on cooperation or competition? Justify your response

History
1 answer:
tatuchka [14]3 years ago
3 0
I would say that early hunting/gathering cultures were much more based towards cooperation, rather than competition. This is largely due to the importance that teamwork held when faced with the need for food. Early societies needed to work together in order to achieve their common goal: survival. Many hands were required in order to feed the population. While competition may have help a role in their society, it was cooperation that held them together. 
You might be interested in
Why was Lincoln concerned he would not win re-election? (What were some of the criticisms of his decisions as president?) (Give
Sati [7]

Answer:

The 1864 Democratic National Convention nominated McClellan, a War Democrat, but adopted a platform advocating peace with the Confederacy, which McClellan rejected. ... Lincoln's re-election ensured that he would preside over the successful conclusion of the Civil War.

not my answer but hope it helps

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a strongest argument for the use of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima?
Gnom [1K]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
• Cruel treatment
Verizon [17]

Answer:is a

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What changes came about as a result of the Commercial Revolution?
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Hey!

I can tell you some things, but if it isn't what you're looking for, I apologize for that!

Explanation:

<h2><u>Commercial Revolution</u></h2>

First, the Commercial Revolution changed Europe from a local economy to a global one. Before the revolution, most goods were produced for family use or to be sold within local towns and villages. Other than a few traveling merchants, there was really no way to peddle goods to a larger population.

However, once trade routes blossomed between European countries and their colonies, a whole new market opened up.

Realizing there was money to be made, people began producing goods to be sold outside of their small communities. In other words, the incentive for profit replaced simply producing for survival.

These new markets and their high demand for goods led to large businesses replacing individual production of goods. As money poured in from this new global trade, Europe continued to transform. The Commercial Revolution also caused a population explosion.

Simply put, as wealth flooded the continent, it allowed for larger families. In turn, these larger families created a work force to sustain and grow Europe's new global economy. Of course, as these new markets opened up, European business owners needed a way to deal with all their money! This brings us to the formation of banks and joint-stock companies.

<h2><u>Definition</u></h2>

<u>Joint-Stock Company</u>- A joint-stock company is a business organization in which shares of the company's stock can be bought and sold by shareholders. Each shareholder owns company stock in a quantity, evidenced by their shares. Shareholders are able to transfer their shares to others without any effects to the continued existence of the company.

<h2><u>Mercantilism</u></h2>

Under mercantilism, colonies were only allowed to import from or export to the European country that governed them.

For instance, if Jamestown, governed by England, wanted to import wool from the Dutch, they could not. Even if the Dutch price was substantially cheaper, Jamestown was stuck buying wool from England. Further hamstringing the Jamestown colonists, all the goods produced by the colonies went to England. England then sold the goods to other countries at a substantial markup, which the crown, not the colonists, kept! In other words, the colonies did the work, while England reaped the profit.

It's like a poor kid squeezing fresh lemons for eight hours, only to have her parents commandeer the lemonade stand! For those of us growing up in the American school system, this ill-treatment of the colonists is a familiar tale. However, we weren't told how the system of mercantilism transformed Europe.

7 0
3 years ago
Part 2: not the same as my other question!!!
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
Constitution

people

citizens

press
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to this lesson, history is the story of people, their__
    7·1 answer
  • when the United states entered world war 2 in Europe, where were American forces first sent on a major offensive?
    15·1 answer
  • Which document, written mostly by Thomas Jefferson, explained the reasons
    11·1 answer
  • What was one precedent set by George Washington? A) Presidents rode white horses. B) Presidents retired after two terms in offic
    8·1 answer
  • Who chooses the prime minister? A. The House of Commons B. The House of Lords C. Direct election by voters D. The Monarchy
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was an advantage the South had over the North in the Civil War? A. Higher population B. Mostly defending
    8·2 answers
  • The ____ ballot is a handicap because the voters cannot possibly learn enough about the candidates for all offices to vote intel
    11·1 answer
  • The Byzantine church of San Vitale is known for its beautiful mosaics. In which country is it situated?
    6·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME: Why did officials in China "over report" the news about harvests in China in the late 1950s?
    9·1 answer
  • Which invention had the greatest impact on the development of textile factories in the North?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!