The imperial presidency is a fact where the abuse of a power by a president makes it seem like an autocratic rule.
Explanation:
Imperial presidency is something that has happened more often than not in the nation in the times of conflict.
The power of the president is risen up in the time of a war or a major crisis and they are ultimately responsible for a lot of informal decisions that are never taken to court for not following the producer of law as there is an innate understanding on it in the wings of the government.
There are times when it is simply more viable to let the President make the decisions without following protocols but it is a murky territory.
In the year 1882, the U.S senate passed the Chinese Exclusion act and was signed by President Chester A. Arthur. During the time period, there was many immigrants, especially Chinese, that immigrated to the United States, which caused a lot of labor. Congress decided to pass this law because a lot of Chinese people were illegally immigrating to the United States and taking away the jobs that the American Citizens wanted. The Act caused the Chinese to be ineligible for naturalization, meaning that they can't become a citizen. Because of the act, the Chinese population in the U.S during that time declined tremendously.
<h2>Answer: Gospel of John
</h2>
In the Gospel of John, the apostle Thomas (<em>taoma </em>twin in Aramaic) is reported as Dydimus, which in koine Greek (the Greek spoken at the time the gospel was written) also means "twin."
As an example, we can read in this mentioned gospel its 11th chapter and 16th verse (according to the New International Version)
:
<em>"Then Thomas (also known as </em><u><em>Didymus</em></u><em>) said to the rest of the disciples, 'Let us also go, that we may die with him.' "</em>
Answer:
A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.
Explanation:
According to a different source, the rest of the question states:
<em>Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario?</em>
<em>A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.</em>
<em>B. Even if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, people would not vote for either person.</em>
<em>C. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would continue to vote for Smith.</em>
<em>D. Even if Senator Smith decided not to run for office again, many people would vote for him as a write-in candidate.</em>
The prediction that is most likely to happen is that, if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would vote for him. We know, based on the passage, that Senator Smith is not well-liked among voters, as he is not considered to be responsive to the needs of voters. Therefore, it is very possible that Senator Smith would find it difficult to compete with another candidate.
Before the agricultural revolution much of England's farmland was "common" land, since there was far less competition in terms of the land being used for crop cultivation.
