An example that I would give of a situation in which a real-life problem has to be solved or a decision has to be made using good judgement would be the case of deciding what to study in university:
<em>"When I had to decide what I was going to study, I immediately put journalism out of my mind, as I believed it did not suit my personality. Even though I loved writing, I had always imagined that journalists had to be aggressive, </em><em>overconfident</em><em> and pushy, and that news only happened in other, more interesting places. I could not see how that could fit me. The school counselor I talked to kept telling me that this was not the case, but my </em><em>belief perseverance</em><em> would not let me listen to other information. In the end I decided to go for accounting. I believed that accounting was only about boring numbers, and for the first few months, I was responsible of </em><em>confirmation bias</em><em>, as that was the only thing I noticed about my studies. However, over time, I grew to like the path I had chosen, and I do not regret it."</em>
Answer:
The trial court focus on presentation of the evidence and examination of the witnesses while appellate courts there are no any kind of witnesses.
Explanation:
In trial court, both sides of the groups present the evidence to show the version of them to the court of what happened. Most of evidence which are presented in trial court comes from the witnesses and exhibits.
On the other side, in appellate courts, witnesses are not there, and any kind of the evidence is not presented. In the appellate courts, lawyers simply argue the legal and the policy issues before judges.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
i guessed and got it right on Edgenuity your welcome
