<span>1. The majority of
American people had a nonchalant attitude towards America's involvement in the
war before the fateful day of the Pearl Harbor bombing on December 7, 1941.
They were aware that a war was going on but did not feel its reality until that
incident. It united the nation overnight. Every citizen was then thinking of
how to contribute to winning the war. Even the industry was focused on
manufacturing war equipment, car production in Detroit was put to a halt for
the manufacturers to start producing planes instead of cars, and the media also
became focused on the war, movies and news centred on World War II.
2. The Pearl Harbor military base was, of course, destroyed right after the
attack, the human casualties was a staggering 2,335, the destroyed and damaged
ships, submarines, aircraft, and cruisers were a great loss to America's
armada. However, the Pearl Harbor now represents a memento of how the nation
acted and became united during the 2nd World War, it has remained an American
Naval Base, which is also open to civilians to visit especially on Pearl Harbor
Day.</span>
Answer:Rebecca would be said to have An implied assumption of risk
Explanation: Assumption of risk is a legal defense used to protect defendants against their plaintiff in lawsuits, For a defendant to utilize the assumption of risk defense, he or she must show that the plaintiff expressed an implied or express assumption of risk towards an activity or event.
An implied assumption of risk, is a type of risk whereby an individual is aware and understands the inherent risk associated with an activity, process or event but voluntarily and willingly accepts to participate in such activity or process.
Here Rebecca is aware of the faulty brakes Owen's car but goes for a ride with him, In case of an accident, She cannot sue or hold him liable to the injuries or damages obtained in course of the ride by claiming negligence on Owen's part part because she was fully aware of the inherent risks before embarking on such ride.
The mandate for the monetary policy goals that has been given to the federal reserve system is an example of a <u>dual </u>mandate.
The Federal Reserve Act mandates that the Federal Reserve conduct economic policy "if you want to sell efficiently the dreams of most employment, stable expenses, and mild long-time period hobby quotes."1 even though the act lists 3 wonderful dreams of monetary coverage, the Fed's mandate for financial coverage is not unusual.
The goals of monetary policy are to sell most employment, solid expenses, and mild lengthy-time period interest costs. by way of enforcing powerful monetary coverage, the Fed can hold strong prices, thereby helping conditions for lengthy-term monetary increase and maximum employment.
Learn more about interest here: brainly.com/question/24924853
#SPJ4
Answer:
The choice ;
C. wanted better access to job opportunities and equal pay