giving punnishments, bring this theme more public so people are aware of it, show really bad side of this theme so people would understand that its a big problem.
The second part of this question (<em>You must include an evaluation of YOUR congressional representative with at least TWO specific examples of why you approve or disapprove of his/her performance</em>) is a personal task, and only you can complete it. However, we are able to provide some assistance with the first part.
It is true that Congress typically has a very low public opinion rating, while at the same time people rate their individual representatives highly. The main reason for this is the fact that people tend to think of their individual representatives as personally closer to them.
A person's representative tends to come from the same city or neighbourhood as the voter. Moreover, he tends to campaign in this area. Therefore, the voter is able to see his face, hear his voice and listen to his platform often. This creates a sense of trust and a connection between representative and voter. Moreover, as the voter himself votes the representative in, he is also more likely to be hopeful about his performance. All of these factors lead to people rating their own individual representatives more highly than Congress itself.
Answer:
Returned
Only word that will fit in after Ms. Adams
Answer and Explanation:
Although you did not present the text to which this question refers, we can infer that the author presents many different jargon, because he wants to refer to many different activities, allowing not only different people to recognize these words, but showing how rich and colloquial language is. diversified. With this, the author shows that the language is alive and easily adaptable to the community to which it is integrated.
