The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
Susan McDougal went to Prison after the Whitewater Investigation for her refusal to cooperate with investigators.
Jim Guy Tucker, who followed Bill Clinton as Governor, also went to jail for fraud in a related case.
I think that it was difficult for the Europeans to defend the crusader states because it just got to intense for them and the crusader states just overpowered them.
The demand for the wheat crackers is elastic. This is because a small increase in the price does not affect the demand but only until the price is further increased does the demand change. This is the definition of an elastic demand. The opposite is inelastic demand and this occurs when a small change in the price results to an immediate or big change in the demand.
The factors that influence when and if a person experiences symptoms from a particular exposure are :
- The amount of time you come in contact which has an effect
- The complementary symptoms that occur
