He believed that the judiciary was a crucial institution for assisting and safeguarding the populace from unjust or oppressive legislation.
<h3>Why is it vital to uphold the Constitution as it was created?</h3>
This is a fundamental component of any constitutionalist system. we must acknowledge that, despite believing majority rule to be the best form of government, the Framers were aware of its flaws. Only then can we appreciate the Constitution they created.
<h3>How is the three branches of government's authority divided by the Constitution?</h3>
The United States' founders The U.S. Constitution established a structure that distributes authority among the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of government, as well as a number of restrictions and safeguards on each branch's authority.
To learn more about Legislation here:
brainly.com/question/15522014
#SPJ4
The United States Congress divided into two houses as all states have equal representation in one house to benefit smaller states, and representation is based on population in the other house to satisfy larger states.
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
The framers of U.S. Constitution have essentially organized the Congress into two establishments namely:
- the Senate, and
- the House of Representative.
The Connecticut Compromise proposed the division of Congress. It was proposed in the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by the Connecticut delegates, Oliver Ellsworth and Roger Sherman.
This object behind this proposal was to maintain the balance of interest of both the large as well as small states as the Constitution has bestowed equal voice to each State in the Senate whereas the criteria for representation in the House of Representative is the size of population of each State.
Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims
The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced
The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws
However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority
Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:
brainly.com/question/9321150
brainly.com/question/14049478
Answer: sure why not I think it can be an amendment.
Explanation:
