(13/20) • 100 = 65%
65% of the can are recycled.
Step-by-step explanation:
here,
principal (p)=£6000
Rate (R)=. 3.4%
time (t)=3 yrs
now,
total investment is compound amount i.e CA
here,
=£6000(1+3.4/100)^3
=£6633.044
here he will get his total investment as £6633.044 in compound interest of 3.4%
Answer:
x = 33
Step-by-step explanation:
sin 29° = 16/x
x = 33
Answer:
90
Step-by-step explanation:
1/5x+4=1/3x-8
add 8 to both sides and subtract 1/5x from both sides
4+8=1/3x-1/5x
12=5/15x-3/15x
12=2/15x
divide both sides by 2/15
12÷2/15=x
when dividing by a fraction, invert and multiply
12*15/2=x
90=x
CHECK:
1/5(90)+4=1/3(90)-8
18+4=30-8
22=22
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
