1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anyanavicka [17]
3 years ago
15

How did the homestead act and the pacific railways act bring settlers to the west?

History
1 answer:
Lemur [1.5K]3 years ago
6 0
The homestead act and the pacific railways act brought settlers to the west through Offering land and getting people supplies faster. 
Homestead act affected the growth of the number of U.S farms, a decrease in Native American lands and an increase in the number of railway lines. Railway act affected the population in the west by increasing settlement on Native Americans land, which forced them to move. 
You might be interested in
The events above all played a role in unraveling of the relationship between the colonists and great britain.Which event do you
Rom4ik [11]

Before the act of emancipation was approved in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and the Kingdom of Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. Relations between the two had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767. The Legislative Body considered that these regulations were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.

However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that this legislative body had no right to assign taxes. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did was constitutional. However, in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether the Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies. Anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American literati - among them Samuel Adams, James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson - discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies -which had their own legislatures- they should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Nile River affect ancient Egypt’s development?
NeTakaya

Answer:

Egyptian civilization developed along the Nile River in large part because the river's annual flooding ensured reliable, rich soil for growing crops. Ancient Egyptians developed wide trade networks along the Nile, in the Red Sea, and in the Near East.

Explanation:

Helped by none other than the <u><em>#QUEEN</em></u> herself <u><em>#DRIPPQUEENMO</em></u>

3 0
3 years ago
Help i give brainliest
dedylja [7]

Answer:

well for the 3rd one I would say One of John Locke's primary ideals was that if the government took rights from the people or mistreated them then the government should be abolished and the people should create a new one. For the 4th one I would say John Locke believed that the people should be the ones controlling the government and what they want should be what is done by the government.

Explanation:

lol basically locke was super anti government. I loved your in your own words. they were great. I hope I helped!

4 0
3 years ago
In Maryland, what were the religious freedoms?
mina [271]

Answer:

i think its you could go to the church of ur choice since the rule was u have to believe in jesus

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why was Rhineland separate from Germany
Naily [24]

Answer:

On 7 March 1936 German troops marched into the Rhineland. This action was directly against the Treaty of Versailles which had laid out the terms which the defeated Germany had accepted. This move, in terms of foreign relations, threw the European allies, especially France and Britain, into confusion.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were men or woman admired for brave deeds called in ancient times?
    9·2 answers
  • How did Aristotle affect automation?<br> Please answer today April 17
    9·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of this speech? What does Jane Addams want to see happen?
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes fighting on the Eastern and Western Fronts during World War I?
    14·2 answers
  • Um idk I just hit this buttun here have 10 points
    13·2 answers
  • 18. When starting and waging a war it is not right that matters, but victory. Close your hearts to pity. Act brutally.
    10·1 answer
  • What was the name for the series of<br> European meetings held in 1884-1885?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the MOST accurate statement regarding the invention and marketing of the electric light bulb?
    5·1 answer
  • Any girls or boys want to join my discord <br> https://dis cord.gg/ufvnHNtSKX<br> no spaces
    7·1 answer
  • PleAse Help ME...............
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!