The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
They were poor band urban
Answer:
great success due to his ability to use his personal charisma to appeal directly to the American people in support of his legislative program
Explanation:
During the J.F Kennedy as the Presidemt of the United States between the year 1961 to 1963 before his assassination, he pursued New Frontier domestic policy, in which he experienced "great success due to his ability to use his personal charisma to appeal directly to the American people in support of his legislative program"
This is evident in the fact that President J.F. Kennedy was widely accepted and loved for his personality by the Americans
