This is a complex question, but generally I would say that it's true.
For example, they would aim at laws that make economy grow, while keeping fair working rights. They also introduce measures to prevent financial crashes, which are very hard on the societies.Only if goverments are corrupt or not democratic would they not do this.
1. Californians approved a constitution that banned slavery.
California was started as groups of settlements that had a largely pro-freedom base, as many of the people who have moved to the west were from the North who brought their beliefs with them. The Californians, because of this, were able to not only approve a constitution that banned slavery, but also join the Union as a free state.
3. Free states would gain a majority over slave states in the Senate.
Because the slave states were keen at getting even with the more populous Northern states inside the government, they wanted a even playing field inside the Senate (as the North had more populations, which meant more representatives). With California joining the Union, it would have gave the Free States much more power in the government then the Slave States.
5. Other western territories might follow California’s example of entering as a free state.
Remember, the South were in a great disadvantage, and so they wanted to keep the balance of state powers in between both the Free States & Slave States. However, with the admission of the Californias to the Free States, it offset the balance within the government, leading to a larger pro-freedom government, and overriding the beliefs of the South.
~
"<span>c. Settlers could buy 160 acres of land for $10" would be the best option from the list since the government provided unsettled land. Although this exact pricing was not always constant.</span>
Answer:
tea
Explanation:
tea is not an english good..
its made in china