1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katen [24]
3 years ago
7

A firm employs 100 workers at a wage rate of $10 per hour, and 50 units of capital at a rate of $21 per hour. The marginal produ

ct of labor is 3, and the marginal product of capital is $5. The firmA) could reduce the cost of producing its current output level by employing more capital and less labor. B) could reduce the cost of producing its current output level by employing more labor and less capital. C) could increase its output at no extra cost by employing more capital and less labor. D) could reduce the cost of producing its current output level by employing more capital and more labor. E) is producing its current output level at minimum cost.
Business
2 answers:
algol133 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct option is "B"

Explanation:

Worker = 100 × $10

Worker = 1000

Capital = 50 × $21

Capital = 1050

As the expense of work is not exactly capital, along these lines utilizing more work and less capital. In addition the minor profitability of work is additionally more than the capital

nirvana33 [79]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

We can increase the output with the same cost increasing the relation work/capital factor relation.

We can keep the same output reducing the cost increasing the relation work/capital factor relation.

Explanation:

The actual situation is:

Work units: 100 units

Work cost: $10 per unit

Marginal productivity of work: $3 per unit

Capital units: 50 units

Capital cost: $21 per unit

Marginal productivity of capital: $5 per unit

For each dollar that we use to increase the work factor, we get 3/10=$0.30 more output.

For each dollar that we use to increase the capital factor, we get 5/21=$0.24 more output.

This values are negative for each dollar of factor of production that is decreased.

With these calculations, we can estimate that the output will grow if we increased the proportion of the work factor in place of the capital factor.

We can measure the cost for two different combinations with the same output.

One is the actual combination, with cost:

C=10*W+21*C=10*100+21*50=1000+1050=2050

If we have 5 more work hours (output grows 5*3=$15), and reduced the capital by 3 units (output is reduced (-3)*5=-$15), we have the same output and its cost is:

C=10*(W+5)+21*(C-3)=10*105+21*47=1050+987=2037

We have proved that if we increase the work/capital relation, we can have the same output with less cost.

You might be interested in
Use the punnett square from the introduction and the ones you drew for part a to select the three statements that are true about
Julli [10]
Any images or dominant or recessive traits to make it?
6 0
3 years ago
Use the following selected 2016 balance sheet and income statement information for Home Garden Supply Co. (in millions) to compu
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

C.51.63%

Explanation:

Gross profit percentage = Gross profit/ Net sales ×100

Gross profit $700,400

Net sales $1,356,504

Hence ;

$700,400/$1,356,504 ×100

=51.63%

Therefore the gross profit percentage is

51.63%

8 0
3 years ago
In 2009 and 2010 Toyota had to recall millions of automobiles due to uncontrollable acceleration. This recall forced upper-level
Afina-wow [57]

Answer: I would recommend Toyota to begin from  Step 2,

Explanation:

Toyota should start from start at stage 2 assess the current reality so that they can move to stage 3 formulate a new grand strategy, implement the new strategy and maintain strategic control.

Toyota Strategy to focus on profit did not work out, the company ended up producing sub standard vehicles. Toyota should Assess the current reality and formulate a new Grand Strategy that will not only focus on profit .

8 0
4 years ago
For each of the following, compute the present value (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal
Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

Present Value = Future Value / ( 1 + interest rate) ^ years

1. Present Value = 15,251 / ( 1 + 7%)¹³

= $6,328.62

2. Present value = 49,557 / (1 + 13%)⁴

= $30,394.24

3. Present value = 884,073 / ( 1 + 14%)²⁹

= $19,780.96

4. Present Value = 548,164 / (1 + 9%)⁴⁰

= $17,452.22

4 0
3 years ago
When there is allocative efficiency in a market, the buyers' maximum willingness to pay for the last unit traded is equal to the
VashaNatasha [74]

<em>That answer is A. True</em>

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "If $120,000 is borrowed for a home mortgage, to be repaid at 9% interest over 30 years with annual payments of $11,680.36, how
    12·2 answers
  • Parker Company has a balance of $23,000 in retained earnings on January 1. During the year, Parker reported revenues of $72,000
    12·1 answer
  • Activities Costs Cost Driver Account inquiry (number of hours) $61,000 2,400 hours
    11·2 answers
  • Why might a someone organize his or her business as a sole proprietorship?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a good example of a substitute product that triggers stronger competitive pressures? A. video-on-d
    5·1 answer
  • Over time, members of the supply chain often formalize their relationship by entering into contracts that dictate various terms,
    15·1 answer
  • In the company's accounting system all fixed expenses of the company are fully allocated to products. Further investigation has
    11·1 answer
  • Discuss three problems associated with teams in organizations, applying concepts learnt in group /team dynamics with practical e
    6·1 answer
  • What is a major function of both retail and business banks?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between a peer to peer LAN server-based LAN
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!