1. Nomads whose herds of cattle provided their clothes and food
2. Warriors with bows and arrows who drove chariots into battle
Answer:
investors increase the amount of capital they control
Explanation:
sorry if it's wrong, it's what I got with my options, and it was right for me.
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
1.After the fall of the Han Dynasty..rebel groups seized control of their own areas of China.Their leaders made themselves kings and started fighting with each other.
2. The Sui Dynasty began to set in motion an artistic and cultural renaissance. Sui emperor seized the throne and took firm control of North China.
3. Sui emperor won the West and South and ruled over unified China..
4. Confucian rituals were reestablished. Penal code was set up and administrative laws that were lenient, fairer, and simpler.
5. Short regime collapsed in a welter of rebellions. The relations with the Turks in the West deteriorated and the wars in Korea to exact tribune failed,
