1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andriy [413]
3 years ago
7

Who holds state power in an oligarchy?

History
1 answer:
Kobotan [32]3 years ago
8 0
A group of people with a large sum of money. hope that helps
You might be interested in
While apprentice for Andrea del verrocchio, what kinds of crafts did Leonardo learn?
HACTEHA [7]
The crafts that Leonardo Da Vinci learned from Andrea del Verrocchio are the following; • Painting – this is a process of having to be able to use a paint in means of having to illustrate a certain image or picture • Sculpting – a way of using something in means of having to use shape techniques, carving or even casting
5 0
3 years ago
How did the policy of appeasement contribute when Adolf Hitler Appointed Chancellor Of Germany
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Adolf Hitler was appointed chancellor of Germany in 1933 following a series of ... führer, who would lead them in a campaign of racial cleansing and world conquest. ... bled white in World War I—these nations chose a policy of appeasement.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Go with did the beliefs of quakers differ from those of the puritans? How did William penn’s actions reflect his beliefs as a qu
evablogger [386]

Both groups believed in a personal experience of God and his power. However, Puritans had ministers in their churches while Quakers did not. Penn desired to gain respect and friendship and paid Native Americans for land. Puritans, on the other hand, despised them and had no will to communicate with them.

5 0
3 years ago
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Describe the living conditions of poor people in America cities in the period 1890-1920
jek_recluse [69]

Answer: For many of the urban poor, living in the city resulted in a decreased quality of life. With few city services to rely upon, the working class lived daily with overcrowding, inadequate water facilities, unpaved streets, and disease.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What the difference that the rich romans and poor romans religion
    12·1 answer
  • The practice of rewarding supporters with positions in government is known as
    14·1 answer
  • How did the countries decide on the site of the United Nations headquarters?
    11·1 answer
  • The general pattern of western mining began with the discovery of gold or silver, which led directly to mining companies buying
    11·2 answers
  • How were the result of the tinker and hazelwood cases different?
    10·1 answer
  • Sociology can be defined as the systematic and scientific study of human society and social behavior, from ___ to ____
    12·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, the US established forts west of the Mississippi River from Louisiana to Minnesota to establish peace among warrin
    13·1 answer
  • Explain the effects of technological advances in the development of the United States over time.
    7·1 answer
  • Why did President Nixon want to open up diplomatic relations with China?
    5·2 answers
  • When lincoln spoke of a pernicious abstraction he was referring to?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!