La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no hay opciones o incisos para responder, podemos decir lo siguiente.
Costumbre o ceremonia que ejemplifica la permanencia en la historia debe que ser de 4 letras y la 2da letra es i.
La respuesta correcta es "rito." Ahí están las cuatri letras, y la segunda es "i."
Un rito es precisamente una costumbre, una forma de hacer las cosas de manera constante o periódica, que bien pudiera ser consierado una ceremonia. Son prácticas que son parte de un acto o protocolo previamente establecido
Como son prácticas frecuentes que identifican a un pueblo, una raza, o un grupo específico esos ritos son parte importante de la cultura y la historia de las personas.
Answer:
B. Papyrus
Explanation:
Egypt and Nubia were bordering with each other, so naturally they traded between each other. The Nubians had their empire located in a position through which the trade between sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa was going on. Sub-Saharan Africa had lot of attractive goods to offer, the Nubians were able to acquire them, and since they were demanded by the Egyptians, they were selling those goods to them. Some of the things that the Nubians provided for the Egyptians were Ivory, ebony, animal skins, and exotic animals as pets, precious metals etc. The papyrus was not one of the things that the Nubians provided to the Egyptians though, as the Egyptians had it in abundance so they were cultivating it by themselves.
It has to do with misinfortmation
Answer:
The economy runs better without governmental involvement.
Explanation:
In the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith lays out a very robust theory about how the economy works, this is why many economists consider him to be the Father of the economic science.
Adam Smith's main thesis was that people, acting own their own interest, were guided by the invisible hand, leading to positive results that benefited the whole of society, even if that was not the main goal of economic actors in first place (their main goal being furthering their own interests).
For this reason, Smith thought that most government intervention was unecessary, since according to him, economic actors tended to self regulate in the market, and to produce an optimal result for society. He did justify some government intervention though: in the military, in the judicial system, and in some basic social services in order to care for the poor, the elderly, and the sick.
