Hello. You did not inform the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for this question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to know the question that the text raises with the reading of the text, however, through the question above we can see that the question is at the end of the text. In addition, you must know that every question must be marked with a question mark (?) at the end of the sentence. In this case, when observing the sentences that end with an question mark , at the end of the text, you will find the question that the author asks the readers to reflect on.
Answer:
'Direct characterization' means the character details authors explicitly describe. For example, telling the reader a character's desires, life philosophy or current emotional state explicitly. An example of direct characterization Direct Characterization tells the audience what the personality of the character is. Example: “The patient boy and quiet girl were both well mannered and did not disobey their mother.” Explanation: The author is directly telling the audience the personality of these two children.
Explanation:
With quotes, and things like that but the quotes work the best and the teachers love that stuff, they just seem to eat it up.
Bierce used the literary technique of flashback in his stories. When authors use flashbacks in their works, it can be difficult to keep track of the chronological order of the story's events. Ambrose Bierce uses flashbacks and flash-forwards in "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge.” In section 1 of the story, the reader sees a man on a bridge with a noose around his neck and surrounded by soldiers. It’s apparent that the soldiers aim to execute the man, but the reason for his execution is unknown, so some readers might sympathize with the man at this point. Section 2 uses a flashback and shows the circumstances leading to the man being on the verge of execution on the bridge. Readers now learn the man’s history and realize that it’s the man’s foolhardiness that got him into trouble. In section 3, the author uses a flash-forward but tricks the reader into believing that the events taking place are in the present. It's only at the end of the story that readers realize that the man on the bridge never escaped the noose around his neck.
Answer:
Somehow get her out of the marriage with Paris?. I think.
Explanation:
I did Romeo and Juliet Freshman year.
