1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fiesta28 [93]
3 years ago
14

What impact did president andrew jackson actions in the 1830s have on the economy?

History
2 answers:
almond37 [142]3 years ago
8 0
They caused inflation to rise. 


(Just had this question on my test and noticed nobody answered. Sorry it was late)
telo118 [61]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The two terms of Jackson as president (1829-1837) were the beginning of a new era in American politics, marked by the participation of the masses and the strengthening of presidential power. It eliminated the last restrictions on the right to vote and introduced the custom of appointing people from the ruling party to occupy the positions of the Administration (spoils system). Jackson introduced the democratic sense of the border into politics, confronting the great capitalists and the business world, whose speculative activity and political influence he had always distrusted; this battle had its climax in the presidential decision to end the privileges of the Second Bank of the United States as central bank. It also boosted the construction of the American nation, for example by expelling the Indians west of the Mississippi.

On the other hand, during his first term he faced Vice President Calhoun about the meaning of the Union: while Calhoun (natural, like him, of South Carolina) upheld the right of each State to nullify federal laws, Jackson defended that the autonomy of the States did not reach the point of nullifying the general legislation. That discrepancy unleashed an open struggle within the Democratic administration, which only subsided when, in his second term, Jackson replaced Calhoun with Van Buren as vice president.

In 1832 South Carolina used the doctrine of Calhoun to reject the newly approved protectionist tariff, which reserved the internal market for the industrial producers of the North, harming the economic interests of the South and the West; Jackson managed to avoid the armed confrontation and the threat of secession by means of a commitment tariff, leaving the presidential power strengthened of the crisis, but leaving open the wound that would be reproduced in the Civil War. Jackson retired from politics in 1837 and was succeeded in the presidency by his close associate Martin Van Buren.

You might be interested in
What was the cause of the Mexican-American War?
Fantom [35]

if memory serves me, it was a border dispute with Mexico over the Texas territory. The Mexicans attacked an American patrol and that was the start of the conflict. But also idk and I could be wrong.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For whom was the battle of Trenton a victory?<br><br> the Americans<br> the British
Setler [38]
It was the americans who won this battle. hope this helps you
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To what extent was the republic destroyed by ambitious generals who loved power more than rome itself?
Softa [21]

A huge gap between the rich and the poor, invaders from other places, emperors’ deaths and soldiers who were lazy in doing were duty were some of the reasons that cause the Roman Republic’s fall.

The Western part of Rome’s empire fell because fell because the military meddled a lot in politics and being a member of the political office was seen by people as an accountability. Revolutions, invasions by Christianity and Barbarians, and civil wars also contributed to the Roman Empire’s dissolution. The Eastern empire lasted for several centuries as they had a lot more resource compared to the Western empire.


3 0
3 years ago
Is Rome civilianisation better or the Viking’s?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

Both were strong at their peaks, but seeing how the vikings were much more used to the sea life and raiding, and how the peak of roman military was extremely focused on conquests, i would say the romans would beat them. But in a water battle, vikings probably take the cake.

hope it helps you

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the first founder of New York
Ber [7]

The first founder of New York was....

Giovanni da Verrazzano

Hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the best explanation for the population decline shown in this graph
    6·2 answers
  • Kesan positif sukan tahunan sekolah
    9·1 answer
  • Help me plss i just need the answer for 3
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a claim about ancient Rome that a historian could
    9·1 answer
  • On a number line, the directed line segment from Q to S has endpoints Q at –2 and S at 6. Point R partitions the directed line s
    5·1 answer
  • Who led a group of 300 settlers from Missouri to Texas and became a Mexican citizen and a Catholic? Question options: A. Stephen
    5·2 answers
  • The journeys of Marquette, Joliet, and La Salle?
    13·2 answers
  • how can I explain the Great Wall was successful in keeping semi-nomadic invaders out, which was the primary concern at the time.
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Spanish-American War helped the United States
    6·2 answers
  • Addressed advantages and limitations of model including: size, scale, properties and materials.​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!