1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BartSMP [9]
3 years ago
7

What impact did the crusades have on the Eastern and Western worlds?

History
1 answer:
marin [14]3 years ago
6 0
The boosting of trade as well as influencing each other’s cultures as well as changing them. Mainly the trading of spices, foods, and materials between the two worlds opened up more after and during the crusades
You might be interested in
4 points
Katen [24]
DescriptionThe Trail of Tears was a series of forced relocations of approximately 60,000 Native Americans in the United States from their ancestral homelands in the Southeastern United States, to areas to the west of the Mississippi River that had been designated as Indian Territory.
5 0
3 years ago
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
Alex787 [66]

Answer:

monks are men and they're religious.. even though you didn't put a list

7 0
3 years ago
1. Describe the characteristics of the government in North Korea,<br> Name
tangare [24]

Answer: One thing I can tell is that the type of government is North Korea is a dictatorship.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did many people in eastern europe consider woodrow wilson a "popular saint"?
strojnjashka [21]
The correct answer is <span>His criticism of imperialism helped Eastern European peoples carve out new independent nations.

He was very critical of European countries that had imperialistic  tendencies and he supported Eastern European countries that wanted to become independent and self-determined which is why he had a huge support in Eastern European countries which is still seen today. For examples, many countries have monuments dedicated to him and streets named after him.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Help me explain please!!!!
hammer [34]
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, a little-discussed provision originally aimed at former Confederates. As relevant here, Section 3 says "no person" may "hold any office, civil or military, under the United States," who, "having previously taken an oath as…an officer of the United States…to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

Before we process, it important to state and describe what the First Amendment say.

The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The freedoms in the First Amendment include the freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

Citing the article of impeachment against the President Trump;

Inciting his followers to violently obstruct the congressional affirmation of President-elect Joe Biden's victory last Wednesday. President Trump's "prior efforts to subvert and obstruct the certification of the results of the 2020 Presidential election,"

Those actions, the article says, "threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of Government." Trump "thereby betrayed his trust as President, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States."

Most of President Trump supporters who were arrested among those that stormed the United States Congress stated that they were urged by what President Trump said calling on his supporters who showed up in D.C. to protest Congress’s certification of the Electoral College and Biden’s victory. When addressing the demonstration during a speech, he encouraged people present to march toward the Capitol, during his rally on January 6th to storm the US Congress therefore President Trump is liable to the cause of the insurrection. Many of the rioters were found to have posted unfounded claims promoted by Trump that the election had been stolen or that widespread voter fraud contributed to President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

First, federal law makes it a crime to engage “in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof.” Someone who violates this statute faces a fine and up to 10 years in prison.

This law makes it a crime to incite such a rebellion, too, and violators “shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” Thus, to the extent that a government official was complicit in Wednesday’s riot, they could potentially be stripped of their office.

Second, the law prohibits a “seditious conspiracy” to “overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States” or to “by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States.” Participants in such a conspiracy could face up to 20 years in prison.

Third, federal law provides that “whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States ... by force or violence” may face up to 20 years in prison, and may also be stripped of their ability to be employed by the federal government for up to five years.
Because this statute criminalizes speech, anyone charged under it would likely claim that prosecuting them violates the First Amendment. But the Supreme Court recognizes several exceptions to the First Amendment for things like incitement to imminent criminal acts or so-called “true threats.” So some of the insurrectionists might be convicted under this statute despite constitutional safeguards for free speech.

Finally, another statute makes it a crime to conspire “to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” Thus, to the extent that members of Congress were exercising a “privilege” secured to them by the Constitution while they were disrupted by rioters, those rioters could potentially face criminal charges.
Violators of this statute face up to 10 years in prison.


7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Athenian democracy
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how events during world war 2 set the stage for the rise of the modern civil rights movement
    5·1 answer
  • The First Amendment guarantees rights for all citizens. people accused of crimes. people guilty of crimes. state governments.
    14·2 answers
  • What was a major change in means of production in Neolithic revolution and industrial revolution
    6·2 answers
  • Why do you think the Germans found Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles so objectionable (offensive)? (3-4 sentences)
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following demonstrates a goal of muckrakers?
    15·1 answer
  • During the 1960s why did we support Latin American dictators
    7·1 answer
  • How did European imperialism lead many colonies to seek independence.
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the chinese exclusion act important
    14·1 answer
  • What year did the united states first stablish a federal army
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!