No, there are some things that men get easier than women. For Example: If women want to get a job like contracting, or construction, they have a harder time getting the job because they are seen as weaker, when that is nor necessarily the case.
I hope this helps please mark as brainliest^^
The relationship of King John and his nobility was not good at all, the king was very unpopular among the barons. There were constant troubles between them, because the king restricted their rights by their own arbitrariness. In order to establish a kind of peace between the king and rebellious barons, Archbishop of Canterbury has drawn up a charter of rights under the name Magna Carta. Magna Carta was signed by King John in 1215. and it was the first document that imposed the legal frameworks for royal power. According to Clause 61 of this Charter, a 25 baron committee would be able to reject the Royal Decree. This would result in the protection of church rights, protecting the barons against unlawful imprisonment, quick justice, and limiting feudal taxes.
According to the law, this document forced King John to accept the rights of the nobility and the limitations of his royal power. In reality, none of the parties have literally adhered to the charter.
The great Athenian leader of the 5th century BCE, Pericles, was swept into power in a popular democratic movement. A member of a noble and venerable family, Pericles led the Athenians against Cimon for harboring autocratic intentions. Pericles had been the leader of the democratic faction of Athenian politics since 462 BCE. Ephialtes was the Athenian leader who had finally divested the Areopagus of all its power; Athens was now solely governed by the council and the democratic Assembly.
Pericles quickly brought forward legislation that let anyone serve as the archon [one of the nine central leaders], despite birth or wealth. The Assembly became the central power of the state. Consisting of all the free-born male citizens of Athens, the Assembly was given sole approval or veto power over every state decision. The Assembly was not a representative government, but instead consisted of every male citizen. In terms of numbers, this still was not a democratic state: women weren't included, nor were foreigners, slaves or freed slaves.
Pericles also changed the rules of citizenship: before the ascendancy of Pericles, anyone born of a single Athenian parent was an Athenian citizen; Pericles instituted laws which demanded that both parents be Athenian citizens. So, in reality, the great democracy of Periclean Athens was in reality only a very small minority of the people living in Athens. It was, however, the closest human culture has come to an unadulterated democracy.
One figure towers over this new democratic state: Pericles. This Age of Athens, which begins either in 462 or 450 or 445 BCE and lasts until 404 BCE, when Athens was defeated by Sparta, is called the Athenian Age, the Classical Age or after its most important political figure, the Age of Pericles.
And still there remains the figure of Pericles himself. There is no question that the democratic reforms of the Age of Pericles owe their existence to the energy of this political figure. He was a man of immense persuasiveness and an orator of great power. Although he was eventually ostracized by the Athenians [he later returned], he dominated the democratic government of Athens with his formidable capacity to speak and to persuade. He had two central policies: democratic reform and the maintenance of the empire.
Sparta, however, growing increasinly wary of Athenian prosperity, would soon find itself entangled once again with its old rival. The thirty year peace managed to hang on for only fourteen years before hostilities broke out again. In 431BCE, a second war broke out, called simply The Peloponnesian War; this war would see the death of Pericles in its second year, but eventually witness the foolish destruction of the Athenian navy, the defeat of Athens and the end of Athenian democracy.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was another very significant compromise during the Constitutional Convention. It had allotted the South to have more representation in the House by counting slaves as 3/5ths of a person.
