The argument is <em>that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders ,</em> where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when <em>they themselves </em>were students . Therefore, t<em>axpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach </em>is the reasoning of the argument.
Answer:
Explanation: From how the landlady spoke to Billy, it could be that she has memory problems. This is proven when she is unable to remember the name of Billy or the people who have stayed before. Although it is only a few people, the landlady is still unable to remember.
Answer:
the mother might be saying they are issing or they got taken by someone she knows
Explanation:
Answer:
Has a feeling attached to a word or phrase
Answer: because slavery is wrong, think of it being someone you know and how it would mentally and emotionally affect you
Explanation: unless you would want to be enslaved then why do it to someone else. I think it's wrong because the slaves are people, not objects, they cannot be owned. They are not pets or property, therefore why be the person to believe in slavery. You are not any better than anybody else and nobody is any better than you.
