Answer:
Explanation:
Summary:
In “The Piece of String,” the story would be very different if told from
the point of view of the farm hand who actually found the wallet. He
would most likely be shocked and concerned that the old man was taking
such grief for something he did not do. It also would have changed the
end of the story.
This is More Detailed:
Maitre Malandain probably does not truly believe that Maitre Hauchcorne has stolen the wallet, but having "the tendency to hold grudges," he takes advantage of an opportunity to deal misery to his foe.
Just as Saki satirized those of the Edwardian Age in England, Guy de Maupassant mocked the pettiness of the peasantry of Normandy, a province in northwestern France. In the exposition of his story, Maupassant describes the Norman women in the market who stubbornly held to their prices in the market and would only relent when a customer began to walk away. Then, they would shout after him or her, "All right...It's yours."
It is this same obstinate and petty...
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It is important for Matt to do research on the topic to get more ideas.
In the passage Brutus claim to Cassius that is he going to be able to see thing that are not there and Cassius replies that he will work as a mirror for him and help him to see the things he don’t see and support that he is honest and trustworthy telling Brutus several bad behavior that would make him doubt of Cassius and finish saying “then hold me dangerous” meaning that if Brutus see Cassius doing that things, only then he could think that Cassius is dangerous.
The list you look for is a). The verb 'to go' is an irregular verb because it completely changes its form in the past: went - gone.
I believe the correct answer is: to support the
article’s and Zimbardo’s argument regarding the influence of social conditions
on behavior.
In the article “What makes good people do bad
things?”, Melissa Dittmann purposely included John Watson’s 1974 and Dr.
Bandura’s 1975 experiments to support hers and professor’s Phillip Zimbardo’s
opinion that social conditions influence behavior. Their experiments illustrate
that people are more aggressive if they stay anonymous, but are on their best behavior
if they know that they will be punished (being called “animals”).
