Answer:
1- Dominant --- most common or influential
2- Morals --- ideas about what is right and good
3- Rule of law --- the idea that everyone should be treated equally by the law
4- Intrinsic --- part of the basic nature of something
5- Ethics --- a set of rules that govern behavior
Explanation:
1- Dominant is understood as that political, social or cultural position that is majority or predominant in a certain place or sector. For example, the dominant political stance in the university sociological sector in the United States is the Democratic Party.
2- Moral is the set of internal rules that each person has regarding their behavior and their relationship with the rest of society, which are imposed by the individual on the basis of his social, historical and religious context.
3- The rule of law is the system of law that establishes freedom, equality, and equity among all citizens who are members of a community or nation. Through this, equality is guaranteed before the law and illegitimate inequalities such as slavery are prohibited.
4- An intrinsic question is that which is inherent in the very existence of the individual or thing to which it refers. For example, for liberal thinkers, freedom is intrinsic to the human condition.
5- Ethics is the set of social and legal norms that govern the conduct of society, through norms that may be imperative and enforceable for individuals.
Answer:
A number of middle-class Africans converted to Islam, while government officials introduced Islamic ideas about government and law.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!!!
Answer: the Miranda warnings had been given
Explanation: the Supreme Court in Miranda vs Arizona held that statements of criminal suspects made while they are in custody and subject to interrogation by police may not be admitted in court unless the suspect first had certain warnings read to him beforehand; these warnings are the famous Miranda rights.
In 1968, Congress passed a law as part of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. This statute directed federal trial judges to admit statements of criminal defendants if they were made voluntarily, regardless of whether he had been read his Miranda rights.
Charles Dickerson had been arrested for bank robbery as well as using a firearm during a crime of violence, both of which are federal crimes. He however moved to suppress statements he made to the FBI because he had not received the Miranda warnings before he spoke to the FBI and the district court suppressed the statements.
To protecting Germany from attacks by Russia
