Answer:
The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor
Explanation:
The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included 250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.
Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).
The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore
Answer:lacked harbors and rivers
Explanation:North Carolina grew slowly because it lacked harbors and rivers.
Their are many factors which force one to think about similarities between Donald Trump and Ronald Reagan by encompassing many issues like:
- Both embraced freedom of religion,
- heavily invested in developing a strong armed forces,
- revolutionized tax cuts to boost job growth and put money back into American operating-class pockets and
- advocated limited entitlement programs in favor of back-to-work and job preparedness initiatives.
The two are not entirely cut out of the same cloth though. There are a few disparities which stand out when it comes to Trump vs. Reagan. For example, opponents of Trump have long claimed that the head of state is not treating all citizens equally, especially that he is marginalizing women and minorities.While this point is being discussed, this is not the egalitarian stance of Reagan: he was a strong believer in personal freedom, and that applied to all men, irrespective of sex, color, faith or other traits.
They wore heavy woolen uniforms which were unsuited to Cuba's tropical heat.
1. No Person except a natural born Citizen or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President
2. neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident