Answer:
Great effect.
Explanation:
Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case has a great affect on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties because this case avoid the civil rights and civil liberties of the Cakeshop who denied of giving cake for the wedding of gay couple due to he thought that it is a religious discrimination. The Cakeshop has the civil rights and civil liberties whether provide its services to a person or not. The Supreme court decision is right as compared to commission's decision that provides civil rights and civil liberties to the Cakeshop.
The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
Answer:
A.admissible as habit evidence
Explanation:
A passenger of Dan sustained injuries and filed a lawsuit against him. The passenger( plaintiff) presented someone to testify about how Dan has a bad reputation for reckless driving in the community.
This testimony by White would most likely be admissible in the court of law because Dan already has a bad reputation of the action he’s been charged with in his community.This makes it admissible as habit evidence.
