The writers of the US Constitution put into practice the idea of separation of powers by establishing three branches of government: the executive (responsible for the enforcement of laws), the legislative (responsible for the passage of laws), and the judicial (responsible for the deliberation of laws). These separate powers then became imbued with the system of checks and balances where no single branch can act completely independently from the other. Take, for example, the appointment of Supreme Court judges.
Appointing a Supreme Court judge is a responsibility of the President, the head of the executive branch. The president will pick a judge thereby influencing the judicial branch. However, the choice must first be ratified by the legislative branch, thereby giving them a deal of power in deciding who is going to become a Supreme Court judge. So there you can see that all branches have a role in this process, none of which can occur without the other branch having an impact.
Answer:
The power the government has over the military and other armed forces is extense. The government could use the military to stop a social movement or a strike. In terms of sheer ability, the government can order the military to act, and be held responsible for the consequences. However, under the Rule of Law, the government does not have the political authority to do so. As it cannot act against the rights and liberties of people. The Rule of Law prevents precisely that: an arbitrary action from the government against its own citizens. The moment a government uses its power arbitrarily and without political authority, the Rule of Law is broken.
Explanation:
Are there any options to your question
Answer:
to be farmed for cash crop
Explanation:
they used these in plantations to make items known as cash crop
