The South American revolutions to the leadership of the Mexican revolution were different because Mexico's revolution failed and was then their own nation. ... The events in Europe were related to the revolutions in Latin America because they both wanted independence and recognition of their group from their leader(s).
Thinking it would be He sought a new approach known as peach through strength
Answer for the second
'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.
The goal of the Sons of Liberty is A. they created an organization to fight the taxes.
I believe it’s answer 2 :)
