1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
4 years ago
14

What triggered the mobilization of military in Austria-Hungary?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I think it's B. Please mark brainliest

You might be interested in
_____, the decision to arrest someone or even to ignore a matter, is a routine part of police work.
svetlana [45]

The answer is police discretion, this is a type of decision which is in particular with police officers of having to decide whether the matter is ignored as it is part of their work or either to get someone arrested.

8 0
4 years ago
Veronica and her friends come up with several options of things to do on Friday night, and ultimately decide to go to a new movi
yulyashka [42]

Answer:

Intuitive thought

Explanation:

Intuitive thought is the sub-stage of Piaget's cognitive development theory. It is the sub-stage of the preoperational stage from age 2 to 7 years but the intuitive thought stage from 4 to 7 years. In intuitive thought sub-stage children are unaware of the knowledge they acquire. In this stage, children show the style of thinking that is called cent-ration. In this style of thinking children focus on only one side of a personal view. De-ceneration is the part of the conservation in this stage. In this stage children asking so many irrelevant questions. Through this, this process children built up their knowledge about the objects.  

8 0
3 years ago
Why is America's knowledge of the constitution so poor?
Furkat [3]

Answer:

Many Americans are poorly informed about basic constitutional provisions, according to a new national survey by the Annenberg Public Policy Center.

The annual Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey finds that:

More than half of Americans (53 percent) incorrectly think it is accurate to say that immigrants who are here illegally do not have any rights under the U.S. Constitution;

More than a third of those surveyed (37 percent) can’t name any of the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment;

Only a quarter of Americans (26 percent) can name all three branches of government.

“Protecting the rights guaranteed by the Constitution presupposes that we know what they are. The fact that many don’t is worrisome,” said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) of the University of Pennsylvania. “These results emphasize the need for high-quality civics education in the schools and for press reporting that underscores the existence of constitutional protections.”

Illegal immigration and constitutional rights

The APPC survey, conducted Aug. 9-13 among 1,013 adults in the United States, finds that 53 percent think that people who are here illegally do not have any rights under the Constitution. That incorrect belief is especially strong among self-identified political conservatives – 67 percent think it is accurate, compared with 48 percent of moderates and 46 percent of liberals.

[The civics survey drew attention from national and local media and many sides of the political spectrum. Read about the coverage here.]

In fact, immigrants who are in the United States illegally share some constitutional protections with U.S. citizens. More than a century ago, in Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), a case involving a Chinese immigrant, the Supreme Court ruled that non-citizens were entitled to due process rights under the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. Other cases have expanded upon those rights.* (For more on Yick Wo, see this video on Annenberg Classroom’s website.)

Most respondents, though not all, know that under the Constitution, U.S. citizens who are atheists or Muslim have the same rights as all other citizens. Seventy-nine percent of respondents know it is accurate to say that U.S. citizens who are atheists have the same rights as other citizens, and 76 percent know it is accurate to say that citizens who are Muslim have the same rights as other citizens.

What does the First Amendment say?

Nearly half of those surveyed (48 percent) say that freedom of speech is a right guaranteed by the First Amendment. But, unprompted, 37 percent could not name any First Amendment rights. And far fewer people could name the other First Amendment rights: 15 percent of respondents say freedom of religion; 14 percent say freedom of the press; 10 percent say the right of assembly; and only 3 percent say the right to petition the government.

The First Amendment reads:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Contrary to the First Amendment, 39 percent of Americans support allowing Congress to stop the news media from reporting on any issue of national security without government approval. That was essentially unchanged from last year. But the survey, which followed a year of attacks on the news media, found less opposition to prior restraint (49 percent) than in 2016 (55 percent).

Many don’t know the branches of government

Only 26 percent of respondents can name the three branches of government (executive, judicial, and legislative), the same result as last year. In the presence of controls, people who identified themselves as conservatives were significantly more likely to name all three branches correctly than liberals and moderates. The 26 percent total was down significantly from APPC’s first survey on this question, in 2011, when 38 percent could name all three.

In the current survey, 33 percent could not name any of the three branches, the same as in 2011.

The phone survey, conducted for APPC by the research firm SSRS, has a margin of error of ±3.7 percent. For more on t

7 0
3 years ago
What would happen to the population of an animal if its food source were added to the food web
balandron [24]
Its population would tend to increase, since the existence of an additional food source would mean that the environment can sustain a larger number of mouths to feed. This could potentially lead to further population increases down the line of the food web if the animal is eaten by others. However, it can lead to imbalances if another food source will be completely eradicated because of the large number of this animal.
5 0
4 years ago
Is it A,B,C, or D???
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 50 POINTS FOR THE ANSWER!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Relationships among people are
    9·1 answer
  • Which Moana is different from the others
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true of jefferson davis but not abraham lincoln
    5·1 answer
  • What are the three things most science fairs require?
    12·1 answer
  • What were some of the ways African-Americans worked to stop slavery
    14·2 answers
  • Is it A. B. C. or D.?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe the three different methods, discussed in class, for measuring social welfare. How does the choice of metric effect opt
    7·1 answer
  • What factors have complicated efforts to unify Afghanistan?
    14·1 answer
  • Should anything be done to legislate against cult activity?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!