Answer:
Hal Marcovitz, the Rise of Julius Caesar
'Roman historian Appian lamented, “The people hoped that [Caesar] would also give them back democracy, just as Sulla had done, who had achieved a position of equal power. However, they were disappointed in this.”'
This shows Caesar was just as bad as Sulla. People were hoping that they would get back their democracy but Caesar didn't give it back much to their chagrin.
Hal Marcovitz, the Rise of Julius Caesar
"As Caesar made his way back to Rome, the Senate ordered him to disband his army. Caesar refused. Instead, on January 10 in 49 BCE, Caesar led his army in an attack on Rome."
This shows that instead of listening to the senate and following orders, he instead got things done through fear tactics.
Explanation:
Answer:
Like how kids procrastinate only because of the amount of work put on them, and all the stress they have to deal with. Then, you could talk about how kids go to websites like this to get awesome answers cause we don't have to try super hard using this method lol. You could include stats about like how many kids have anxiety or something because of the workload put onto them, so you could lead into multiple things.
Explanation:
Hope that helps
Answer:
So in the story, the pardoner would let individuals know that, in case they gave him cash, every one of their transgressions would be eradicated or washed away. At the point when individuals would feel remorseful for a transgression, they would purchase their "salvation" from the pardoner. I feel like what this says about the pardoner is that he is narrow minded and dishonest. He exploits individuals. The pardoner designated individuals in a frantic condition of not needed the fierceness of God to come over them. He utilized this for his potential benefit which is self centered. He was defrauding these individuals by not really giving them salvation. He was exploited the mentality they were in for his own benefit.
Explanation: Hope this helps:)
Answer:
D. Jonas raises an army to violently overthrow the industry leaders.
Explanation:
A contrived ending to the story is one created in a way that seems artificial and unrealistic. The most contrived ending would be the one where Jonas raises an army to violently overthrow the industry leaders.
The rest of the options seem more or less possible. Jonas' supporters could turn their back on him, the industry leaders' plan could backfire, or they could ruin Jonas' reputation. These endings would seem believable. However, it would be impossible for Jonas to raise an army. An individual wouldn't be able to do that in real life, which is why this type of ending wouldn't make sense.
