1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solniwko [45]
3 years ago
5

Most people remember Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as reformers who practiced non-violent forms of protest and advocacy

. Both effectively changed the popular opinion about emotional issues for their countries and brought in a wave of change that was long overdue. But the practice of non-violent protest, or civil disobedience, started long before either Gandhi or King. It began with a quiet, shy poet who is best known for writing a lot about a pond.
Henry David Thoreau lived from 1817 until 1862, mainly in the area of Concord, Massachusetts. The issue that would tear the country apart in the 1860s had already begun dividing the nation. Thoreau was only 14 when Nat Turner led the slave rebellion in Virginia and was later hanged. In his late 20s, Thoreau began speaking against slavery in public, echoing the voices of freedmen like Frederick Douglass and Lewis Hayden.

Thoreau believed that a government that supported slavery was corrupt and immoral. He was also deeply suspicious of government. For these and other reasons, Thoreau refused to pay his poll tax for a number of years. The poll tax was a legal tax owed by every person. It was basically a tax on one's body. After not paying for years, he was at last arrested. He spent only one night in jail, however, as a relative paid the tax for him. He was reportedly furious that any tax was paid on his behalf.

It was this experience that Thoreau wrote about in an essay called "Civil Disobedience." In this essay, he argued that being moral and just came before allegiance to government. He wrote “If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law." He also felt that voting was not enough to ensure that the right thing be done. He wrote that "even voting for the right is doing nothing for it… A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance…" He felt that one had a moral responsibility to resist unjust laws.

Read the sentence below:

"A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance…"

In this context, what does the word chance mean?

Luck
Forgiveness
Incidence
Privilege
English
1 answer:
LUCKY_DIMON [66]3 years ago
5 0
Hello There

Answer: Luck

Reason: The word luck could easily replace the word chance. He is saying that anything can happen.

I hope This helps
-Chris<span />
You might be interested in
identify the noun in the following sentence. Rohit plays for india​
Nimfa-mama [501]

Answer:

Rohit and India

Explanation:

A noun is a person place or thing

6 0
3 years ago
i need a quick essay on whether to tell kids the truth about bad things that happen in the world. i dont need a lot of pages jus
kirza4 [7]

It is very important how information is handled and this may be different from one family to another.

In all the families there are events of a certain severity, and in the world in which we are passing unfortunate things every day such as catastrophes, wars, people dying of hunger, etc. And it is there where we ask ourselves if we should keep children out of these things, and that is when it is not true to think that children should live in limbo. We should not believe that we should always keep them away from the sad news. If we act in this way, we will deprive them of learning and assimilating fundamental aspects of life.

They can even learn something that we certainly do not intend to teach them: to systematically ignore important plots of reality, to stay away from the things that matter, to feel that their opinion does not matter and that they are not counted on. This can become a stable feature of his personality, producing unconscious, selfish, stunned types who never find out about anything ...

Children also have the ability to grasp when something important happens; but if you do not know what it is you can get confused and worry,   they can feel the sadness by threat of a catastrophe, taking their imagination beyond reality .

Considering that children are important members of the family, it is convenient to inform them of the important facts that affect them. But if it is sad facts, we must be prudent, avoid the harshest and most disturbing aspects, reassure them and transmit security.

And we should not be so explicit in telling them everything, because sometimes it's not important for them. We must know how to say things to children, and teach them that you should not talk to other people sometimes about what is happening as it could turn into a bigger problem, for example talk about war, politics, religion ... we should teach them to respect the points devista of others but not to ignore the truth.

Depending on the age of the children, it will be easier to understand them, but at any age we must be subtle to explain what is happening in this complicated world and offer them the necessary tools to face reality; among these tools are to give them security, trust, support, and for children to know that they can always count on that person who will always tell them the truth and will not have to look for others who give them the distorted information.

5 0
3 years ago
After Elizbeth forgives Hamilton did Hamilton cheat on his wife again? write in 5 sentences or more
Ber [7]
<h2>can i be marked brainliest???</h2>

Yes, for nearly 50 years as his widow she worked to preserve his papers, efforts to have his biography produced, accomplishments recognized and the statute bust of her husband preserved in her home. She referred to him as “my Hamilton” and she was the maybe last living member of that generation; she almost lived long enough to bridge the revolutionary war days with the War Between the States. Her work other than raising her many children after Hamilton’s death was to preserve his memory for the future ages. And she did build orphanages and other good deeds, just as you mentioned, Nadia.

I am adding to my reply for Nadia, a high schooler, who stepped up to the plate, and her reply is a well thought out….but I believed she may want and deserves some of the information that the “old-timers” have. (And I don’t have a granddaughter) Nadia, I pulled out several of my books about the Hamiltons.

I paged through them for Nadia. As a woman, in my thinking, the Hamiltons had two unimaginable events that stand out from all the challenges in their lives. It doesn’t matter which came first.

The Hamiltons, from what I have read, had a loving, gentle, and lasting marriage in spite of the “affair” Mr. Hamilton had during that hot summer in New York when his family was away north to enjoy a bit of coolness and he wanted to be with them. He appears to be caught between his love of his family and the love of his country. He felt a deep need to write many letters for the public press (without his name so the letters were read without any prejudice)

He was writing the need for a newly forming government “of the people, by the people and for the people” country and for new ideas and many other matters to educate and persuade the people of his “adopted country” to support a way of thinking our country should be. There were some very strongly opinionated, powerful people who did not agree with what was written in those letters to the press. The decisions on these matters would form the roots of our country’s government to grow and the time to make these decisions was coming.

The “affair” was a setup. None the less, it happened. Hamilton was alone and lonely and worn out by his work at writing so much. She was attractive, needy (at the time) and there is something called lust. That may be an excuse, but not the right thing to do in Hamilton’s life. It was not uncommon; the reason his affair did is for another question to ask for an answer.

Now, let's play with time and history. Hamilton’s first son Philip was a teenager asking for advice regarding what and how to handle a “duel” with a man in his 20s. The man was saying things about Hamilton and his son stood up to that man, etc….and it all foolishly led to a duel.

During the discussion between a worried father Hamilton and his son, Hamilton talked about ways perhaps ways to stop or handle the duel so no one is harmed. He mentions to his son, that his mother had dealt with one great emotional harm already, and he fears she could not bear another. Is that not love by Hamilton for both Eliza and his son? And also shows while Eliza was working on forgiveness, there was love. She was expecting her eighth and last child. A person can be forgiven, but some things are hard to forget.

Now let’s only take a tiny step forward in history. Philip died from his wound in the duel.

And there was no way to bring her Philip back.

The loss of her first child, while she was expecting her last. Nineteen old Phil was mentored by Hamilton on how to handle the duel. In those years of US history duels were not uncommon to settle “disputes” between “gentlemen” but it was not necessary to actually shoot one another. To save face, each could deliberately “throw their shots away.’ Apparently, Philip followed his father's advice, but contrary to local custom, his apparent opponent was not a “gentleman” and shot Philip.

I believe the loss of Philip was THE unimaginable loss to both Eliza and Alexander together as their son died hours later. I wonder how long it took for her forgiveness to Hamilton. And for Hamilton to forgive himself for not being able to do more to prevent the duel without his son being labeled a coward. Mature love is powerful, remarkable, and difficult to understand.

5 0
3 years ago
What did they make mandela and the other prisoners do while they were in jail
suter [353]

Answer:

They made Nelson Mandela And the Prisoners Crush Stones with hammers.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What kind of complement is the underlined word?
tatyana61 [14]
The answer is B.indirect object because indirect object <span>is a noun or a pronoun that answers the question, and him does that so him is indirect object in the sentence</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Evidence that Curley's wife is overdressed and out of place on the ranch?
    14·1 answer
  • The plural form of the word "story" is ___.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of these is most likely to be found in a daily rather than a periodical? An article on the effects of national disaster an
    10·1 answer
  • 2. To better capture the personality of the individual, the artist chose to
    14·1 answer
  • Why does the monster see himself as different from Adam?
    15·2 answers
  • Highlight the central idea of the paragraph below. Many penguins live in the cold climate of Antarctica. But not all penguins li
    6·1 answer
  • What was Saul to do at Gilgal? Begin a war with the Ammonites. Offer sacrifices to God. Stay with the men who where on their way
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Lan is tall. (Mai) =&gt; ...................
    11·1 answer
  • Please help me
    7·1 answer
  • Find the error with subject-verb agreement. Select the incorrect verb and type it correctly. The number of English dialects are
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!