Answer:
II and III
Explanation:
A species is classified as endangered when it comes to a situation where the number of individuals within the species is so low that it might not be enough for it to reproduce properly and survive. Also, when species is listed as endangered, the chances are very high that the species will go extinct.
In order for the species to be saved, there are numerous methods that are used:
- One thing is to make the hunting of the species illegal, usually making a very strict law that would fend off anyone tempted to do so.
- Creating a special program for monitoring the species, where every individual will be tracked, constantly checked, and protected on the ground.
- Any entry into the area where the species lives to be forbidden, except for scientific goals related to the species, and even for it to have a species permit.
Unfortunately, this doesn't always have the wanted effect, and despite all efforts some species go extinct, like it is the example with several species of rhinos in the past century. On the other hand, there are species that seem to be extremely resilient, and despite having very low numbers, they manage to survive, even if they don't have any particular rise in their populations, like it is the examples of the Iberian lynx and the Balkan lynx.
Very often, the method of breeding individuals in captivity of a species that is endangered is used. This is done so that there are controlled circumstances and no danger for the offspring, thus to maximize the chances of their survival. By using this method though, special programs are needed afterwards in order to prepare the young ones for life in the wilderness, which is not always successful.
Answer:
The factors responsible for it are as follows: Growing demand for cultivated land to meet the food grain requirements. This has been caused by growing population of the country. Industrial development and mining that have resulted in forests being cleared away to enable access to resources
Well first, cons
1.) We can't forecast the timing, so that's a biggie. The prospects of forecasting the timing for earthquakes is quite dim at the moment and not in the foreseable future.
2.)Unless you predict earthquakes 100% of the time then improper forecasting can actually result in fatalities and lifeloss.
3.)If we could predict earthquakes, there would be some huge societal implications. For instance Hurricane Katrina was predicted several days out but that didn't result in a wholly successful evacuation of New Orleans which was biased against the poor.
4.)Accurate forecasting would not change the need for preparedness and good building codes. The ground is still going to shake, buildings still need to resist lateral seismic forces, people still need to be prepared for not having gas, water, telecom, electricity, for a certain amount of time.
And pros,
It would relieve some peoples anxiety about "when the big one" is going to hit. But then that would turn into "how big is the big one" anxiety.
The questions you ask can be considered similar to "what are the pros and cons of forecasting when each of us will die". It doesn't change the fact, just what and how we worry about it.
1. Icebergs began to melt Coastal flooding
2. A huge upwelling fed large new schools of fish
3. Colder than normal temperatures
4. Colder than normal temperatures
Answer:
Uranus and neptube, they are known as ice giants.
Explanation:
