Answer:
Societal recognition. Status symbols also indicate the cultural values of a society or a subculture. For example, in a commercial society, having money or wealth and things that can be bought by wealth, such as cars, houses, or fine clothing, are considered status symbols.
Explanation:
this may not give you the answer but i hope this will help to get your mind going on the topic that you are working on.
Answer:
markets are likely to be attracted to travel on cargo ships? What about river cruising? Explain the reasons for your opinions.
Some roles that a parent of a child who has a disability might undertake would be:-
The legal definition of "disability" is when a person is unable to engage in substantial paid employment due to a health or physical disability, a disability that is likely to be fatal, or a disability of a continuous or continuous nature. It can be considered a disabled person. Uninterrupted period
• Inclusion Specialist Ensuring that children are as involved in typical classroom activities / daily life as possible
• Personal Future Planner Help your child plan for the future by examining all areas of interest, skills, strengths, and needs (eg secondary school, work, finance) Target arrangement).
• Case Manager Overseeing all educational, health, and related services & coordinating care
• Medical Expert Understanding the medical issues surrounding the child, their disability/medical
Learn more about disability here:brainly.com/question/826688
#SPJ4
I belive the answer is: Voters
Lobbyist consist of a group of people that aimed to support a certain representatives in order to legally influence the outcome of the legislation.
These lobbyist tend to represent actual segment of registered voters for a specific cause that deemed as important for them.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
