Second thoughts:
I don't think doing anything in the future will be of use, because we should have already done it, and we didn't, so we have to do it now.
And what we should do is:
To find and actually use and apply new energy sources.
To do more (or less, depending on what the problem is).
To clean the mess we have done / recover the gap in the ozone layer /fix the damage that we have caused.
If you're interested:
I don't think protesting (like we're currently doing) will be of help for two simple reasons:
1. - I don't know for sure, but I don't think politicians care, like or pay attention to protests (unless it's something like the Yellow Jackets).
2. - The time we spend protesting is more valuable than we think. We should leave that aside.
Hope it helped,
BiologiaMagister
Answer:
Answer b is the right one
U thought you was getting free answer my points now thanks for thats point tho
Answer:
Peer review
Explanation:
<em>Before a research can be published, it is subjected to scrutiny by experts that are versed in the same field. The scrutiny ensures that research authors observed the required standards expected in their fields and ensure that personal biases and unwarranted claims are eliminated before the research is published.</em>
This is otherwise known as peer review.
Explanation:
plant with narrow leaves and shallow roots would probably be found in the desert, where there is not a lot of water. Narrow leaves help prevent water loss. Shallow roots can spread out long distances in search of water.