Answer:
Option B, Jamal is entitled to revoke acceptance because he took back the motorcycle after the seller's assurance that the nonconformity would be cured.
Explanation:
The primary purpose of purchasing goods is to obtain conforming goods of the desired quality. Occasionally, the seller delivers non-conforming goods, goods that fail to meet the contractual obligation (obligations include: seller's description, statements promises...). In situations like this the buyer may revoke his acceptance if already accepted or reject the delivery upon discovery.
If delivery is already accepted, acceptance may be revoked;
* On the reasonable grounds that its non-conformity would be cured and it has not be cured.
* Without discovery of such non-conformity if his acceptance was reasonably induced either by the difficulty of delivery before acceptance or by the seller's assurances.
Therefore, option B best suits the question. Under these circumstances, Jamal is entitled to revoke his acceptance because the he took back the motorcycle after the seller's assurance that the non-conformity would be cured which was not, even after several complaints.
I believe it’s internal stimulus because of learnt and instinctual behavior
There are several benefits for McDonald's by using FIFO methods. Here we will discuss some of them: better food hygiene, which gives more customers satisfaction; easier to reduce products near their end-date—resulting in more sales and less waste;
<h3>What is FIFO?</h3>
FIFO is a measuring tool for inventory valuation or management. In this, we have sold the goods which come first. This is called a FIFO, which is known as First In First Out.
Thus, McDonald's using the FIFO method gets such benefits as better food hygiene, which gives more customer satisfaction; easier to reduce products near their end-date – therefore more sales and less waste.
Learn more about FIFO here:
brainly.com/question/17236535
#SPJ1
Answer:
$2,880
Explanation:
US GAAP requires companies to value their inventories at lower of cost or net realizable value.
so we calculate both:
- the cost = 8 x $530 = $4,240
- the net realizable value = 8 x $360 = $2,880
Since the net realizable value is lower, then the computers must be recorded at that price.
The statement, "According to an SEC investigation, Computer Associates, one of the world's largest software companies, backdated contracts to boost the company's reported revenues. This is not prescribed as an ethical business practice." is True
.
Option a
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
To thrive in the competitive world of business one has to have ethics in doing business. By doing ethical practices in the business it will boost the image of the company before the customer and it will be helpful for them to compete in the market.
From the above statement even though it is the world's largest software company it has backdated the projects contracts period to show better performance in the revenues.
Even though the project are genuine but the moral responsibility in reporting revenues to the investors take taken a dent by doing an unethical thing.
