Answer:
Yes, I agree with Mack's argument because he was able to clarify and give enough evidence on how reading Shakespeare is similar to that of studying the real world and our own selves. It also emphasizes the integrity of the heart and mind and how such unity makes a person understand and become educated.
Explanation:
The question above is related to Michael Mack's argument <em>"Why Read Shakespeare?" </em>He provided evidence regarding the good side of reading the works of Shakespeare. For him, although <u>reading Shakespeare's works may seem hard at the start, reading it over and over again will allow the person to grasp its true meaning.</u> He also compared it to that of studying different courses in college and learning to play a particular music.
The correct answer to this question is letter ". C) The comma attempts to separate a compound predicate."
The first part of the sentence is the predicate, so it's not trying to separate a subject.
"Then skylights that were made of aluminum siding" isn't a sentence, so it's not an independent clause."
Answer:
The figure of speech used when the writer says “The pencil understood and promised to remember, and went into the box with purpose in its heart.” is <u>Personification</u><u> </u>[ giving human qualities to a non-living thing (pencil) such as <u>understood</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>promised</u><u>,</u><u> </u>etc.
Answer:
The Answer is A.
Or walk with Kings – nor lose the common touch,
Explanation:
Hope this helps