I'm not sure since I can't read the passage, but I think D is least important.
The first one. All of the other examples are talking about things price-wise, whereas a cheap excuse is a very bad excuse.
Answer: In this case, both pronouns can be used to complete the sentence as both terms grammatically make sense, however whom is the prefered pronoun.
Explanation:
The difference between “who” and “whom” is the same as the difference between “I” and “me;” “he” and “him;” “she” and “her;” etc. Who, like other pronouns such as I he, and she, is a subject. So, it is the person performing the action of the verb. On the other hand, whom, acts like me, him, and her in a sentence. It is the object. Therefore, it is the person to/about/for whom the action is being done.
But what does that mean? “Who,” the subjective pronoun, is the doer of an action. For example, “That’s the girl who scored the goal.” It is the subject of “scored” because the girl was doing the scoring. Then, “whom,” as the objective pronoun, receives the action. For instance, “Whom do you like best?” It is the object of “like”.
Who should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence.
Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition.
<span>*Author:Karel Capeck
*main character(s)
-God
-the murder/kugler
-the judges
*Main Ideas
-people can only be judged by people not God --> beuase God is omicent he will also be influenced by the good things we've done; on the other hands we humans focus on the crimes we have committed: as a result we harshly punish ourselves thus making us not do the crimes again due to being discouraged in other words God would be to nice and easy since he loves us thus we do not deserve his justice
-purpose of anecdotes in kugler's life
-what is the purpose of the story ending when he summons the next criminal</span>