The American Revolution was not a civil war because a “civil war” is typically between two groups within the same country. For instance, Parliament and the King fought each other in the English Civil War. Similar conflicts occurred between the Union and the Confederacy during the American Civil War.
Contrarily, the American Revolution was a conflict between a colonizer and a colony. Usually, these are not referred to as "civil wars," but rather as "rebellions," "revolts," or (to their supporters) "wars of liberation."
Any of these might constitute a "revolution," so long as it alters society, the economy, and culture fundamentally as well as the leadership. As you can expect, this makes the word "revolution" very political. The proponents of change refer to it as a "revolution," whilst the opponents use a less admirable term.
The Civil War would have been referred to as a "revolution" if the Confederacy had prevailed, and the Union may have even done so at some point. Instead, it fell short, and now we refer to the conflict of 1861–1865 as a civil war. It's just another instance of how the winners write history.
To be precise , the continent such as Europe, does not exist. Continent is called Eurasia and Eurasia - the largest continent in the world. Answer: B.
The summary of the contra affair is that the administration of Reagan helped to fund illegally the Contras that were from Nicaragua.
- The contra affair was the secret facilitation of the sale of arms from the senior government officials to the Iran nation.
The money that was made from this sales was hoped to be used to fund the Contras that were in Nicaragua.
Read more about the contra affairs on:
brainly.com/question/12292237?referrer=searchResults
