Answer:
People and governments should play an active role in awareness programs.
Explanation:
- The movement of the people and the ideas and the food all are included in the cultural aspects of the globalized world and as they have their positive impacts they also have there negative impacts like that of the diseases and there impacts on the health of public badly affects the nations economy and the trade flows.
- <u>Several steps must be take to stop or reduce the flow of the disease and control there harmful effects at the source regions as to lower the spread of the global disease, maybe by the elimination of the waste generation and full and proper diagnosis and monitoring of the food born illness. By limiting the factors that can cause exposure to these diseases.
</u>
- Measures like the proper disposal facilities and food standards should be maintained as guided by the WHO and UNEP, checking the source is a most essential precaution that can be taken along with more awareness programs the stare and the local governments.
I looked to the National Bureau of Economic Research, who recently published Globalization and Poverty. Here’s what I found out:
Some studies show that globalization has been associated with rising inequality, because the poor do not always share in the gains from trade. An example of this is the coffee trade. Coffee is the second most traded commodity in the world, yet most of its growers only make 10% of what it eventually sells for. However, when farmers have access to credit, technical know-how, and social safety nets such as income support, trade can benefit the world’s poor.
The book argues that export growth and incoming foreign investment have proven to reduce poverty. But, at the same time, trade and foreign investment alone are not enough to alleviate poverty. Increasing access to education and credit, as well as improved infrastructure, are necessary in order to see real progress. Echoing that idea, Harrison concludes that globalization can benefit people living in extreme poverty, but only if the appropriate complementary policies and institutions are in place.
You can try Texas and Pennsylvania
I say it doesn’t there is no sign in the movie that relates back to geography besides when they talk about where they are at and where they are going
