Facts
<span>1. </span>Plaintiff is a food product firm. Defendant worked as a salesman
of plaintiff’s.
<span>2. </span>Defendant wanted to start work at plaintiff’s competitor.
Plaintiff sought an injunction against defendant based on noncompete agreement
from plaintiff’s employment. The non compete agreement prohibits plaintiff from
competing with plaintiff in certain areas which included around 70 countries
mostly within Arkansas with some in Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas.
<span>3. </span>Trial court held for defendant on grounds that were no trade
secrets involved and the area was unreasonably large and restraint on trade.
Plaintiff appealed.
Relevant terms
Noncompete agreement 9employee)
is a clause in employment contact that prohibits employee from working or
starting business in similar field as employer. Some states do not allow these
agreements and the clause may be struck by court if deemed to unreasonable e.g.
can’t work in similar field forever is an unreasonable restraint.
Opinion
The court agreed with trial,
the area of noncompete is sufficiently large and unreasonable. Also it
disagreed that defendant had any trade secret that would give him unfair
advantage. They conceded if anything it was the goodwill gained by defendant
from customers in his capacity as a salesman, however, goodwill is the property
of defendant not plaintiff.
<span>Appeals Court affirmed the
decision.</span>