McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Evidence supports the claim:
- The clock kept saying the time over and over and the house kept preparing food, but no one ate it.
- No one got up to go to work or school.
- The house was the only one standing in the neighborhood, which was among dust and ashes.
Explanation:
The name of the story refers to the poem by Sara Teasdale where the idea that nature will survive humanity is transmitted.
It can be interpreted that what happened to the family of the house was that they were exposed to a nuclear explosion, since their figures marked with fire are seen on the side of the house, the same thing happened in Japan after the atomic bomb of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even the poem was published 5 years after this event.
The poem shows an automated house that continues to operate even though there are no longer any people. Keep cleaning, keep cooking and reporting the time, but no one exists anymore.
In fact, this house was the only one left standing in the desolate neighborhood. Even when the house collapses and is almost destroyed, it still has some basic functions.
Answer:
Hello. You did not provide the text options, but I can help you by saying that in the ninth paragraph the author says that in the early years as a writer, she had little confidence in her ability to write, but she continued writing and improving even so.
Explanation:
In the ninth paragraph, the author reveals how her resilience was important for her establishment as a writer. This is because she says that at the beginning of her career, she did not feel confident in writing, she did not think that the texts she wrote were good and she was very insecure about her writing skills, but she was resilient and continued writing even thus, believing that it would get better little by little and more each day.
Life is not only worthwhile if you are happy living it. You have been blessed with the chance to experience the world through your current life. If you are not happy living it, then you are doing something wrong. There are things out there that can make you happy. Go out and try something new. You should be happy that you have the chance to experience the world.
<span>The
research paper introduction should begin with Christie’s thesis statement and
briefly mention her argument in order to give the reader an idea of what the
paper is about, whereas the conclusion should restate the thesis statement and
tie up her argument. All mentions about counterarguments should be covered
within the body of the research paper in great detail.</span>
