1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DaniilM [7]
3 years ago
6

How would voting help women change the conditions in which they worked?

History
1 answer:
slamgirl [31]3 years ago
6 0

If you are talking about modern life now, it would not. This myth is brought to you by feminists. Voting women in to office changes nothing as men and women are equal. As a woman it bothers me a great deal that real people I will work with in the future have this opinion. This belief will change the conditions in which they work. I assume when you refer to "conditions" that you are saying that they are bad conditions. They are not, they are the same as men. Making this kind of distinction is very important as the myth is slowly being raised to think it is a fact to to be dealt with when in fact it is the opposite.  

You might be interested in
If you enter 234.567 into a cell that is formatted to display 1 decimal place, what is the value stored in the cell?
valina [46]
Jakaskaksisjajbabsbajajananajajajansbssnaksksnsbsnjs
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did joining the AMercian cause have the potential to alienate Lafayette and disgrace his family ?
mr_godi [17]
You can find this awnser on the internet just copy and paste your question there
5 0
3 years ago
What theme is featured in Machiavelli's The Prince?
barxatty [35]

Answer:

The theme of the prince is accepting that the aim of princess such as glory and survival can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
How do societies adapt after natural disasters?
disa [49]

Answer:

Explanation:

The frequency of natural disasters, especially in the form of floods and storms, has quintupled over the past 40 years, the elevated disaster risk being partly due to the effects of climate change. Developing countries bear a higher share of the adverse consequences of that increased risk.

Heightened disaster risk associated with poor management of the natural environment and human-induced climate change requires a long-term approach to reducing risk from natural events. Anintegratedandpreventiveframeworkembeddedinnationaldevelopmentstrategies would be most effective.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did President Theodore Roosevelt hope to do with his Square deal?
    11·2 answers
  • HEEEEELP PLEEEEASE!! I DONT REMEMEBER THIS SUBJECT AND I DONT HAVE TIME TO GO OVER IT BECAUSE I HAVE TO GO IN A FEW MINUTES! PLS
    13·1 answer
  • What are the main characteristics of chivalry?
    14·1 answer
  • Norris v. Alabama found that:
    14·1 answer
  • I need help with this:))
    15·2 answers
  • As a result of the Battle of Sabine Pass,
    11·1 answer
  • Use these two words in a sentence in a way that shows their meaning and relationship a.productivity b.domestic slave trade?
    7·2 answers
  • ANSWER NUMBER 6 I need help
    10·1 answer
  • What happened because of the attack in Pearl Harbor?
    8·2 answers
  • 6. Read the quote from Peter Stuyvesant, Dutch governor of New Amsterdam, about his encounter with British forces. Use the quota
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!