Here is the correct sequence:
<span>B) The scientist puts the bacteria in three different environments:
high salt, medium salt, and low salt
</span>
<span>A) The scientist asks the question, Does salt help the growth of these bacteria?
</span>D) The scientist forms a hypothesis that higher concentration of salt may increase the growth of these types of bacteria.
<span>C) A microbiologist notices that some bacterial species thrive in salt water environments.
</span><span>F) The scientist finds that the high-salt environment has the most bacteria.
</span>
<span>E) The scientist publishes his report in a scientific journal.</span>
Secondary pollutants are more harmful than primary pollutants. False
<h3>Primary and secondary pollutants</h3>
Primary pollutants are pollutants released directly to the environment from their sources.
Secondary pollutants are formed from the reactions of primary pollutants with other substances in the environment.
Both primary and secondary pollutants can equally be harmful to living organisms. What distinguishes their harmful level would be the nature of the substance.
Thus, saying that secondary pollutants are more harmful than primary pollutants is not completely true.
More on pollutants can be found here: brainly.com/question/23857736
#SPJ1
so i believe the answer is c and if not or if u can select more then 1 i would also choose b just encase but overall the answer is c i believe
‘Noble gases’ are least reactive as their outer shells are fully filled with electrons. These do need to share their electrons from outer shells with other elements .