4 years ago

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

History

2 answers:

mestny [16]4 years ago

5 0

correct answer is B) to learn

Stells [14]4 years ago

4 0

<span>B. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event</span>

You might be interested in

The main driver of population growth in britain between 1750 and 1850 was

Rasek [7]

Https://www.coursehero.com/flashcards/909241/Chapter-27-Industry-Ideology-and-Their-Global-Impact/ I believe this website will help you find your answer! Hope this helps! =)

3 0

4 years ago

Why did the British impose many taxes on the colonists?

klemol [59]

Answer:A

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

WILL GIVE 30 POINTS!

Thepotemich [5.8K]

The monks mastered in architecture and pulled together the necessary funding to build magnificent cathedrals.

8 0

3 years ago

Why did people move to specific towns?

a_sh-v [17]

A is the answer because the natives American tribes wanted a better life

4 0

3 years ago

Question 13 of 27

nekit [7.7K]

The answer is B, found it on Chegg

7 0

3 years ago