Tricky. Locke's ideas were embraced by the founding fathers and Jefferson but Hobbes ideas of supreme government power were rejected. Locke influenced Jefferson, yes but Hobbes was rejected. His ideas found a home in <span>Voltaire and Rousseau however.
</span>
In my opinion, the statement is true. Locke had influence, Hobbes did not.
I sincerely apologize if I got it wrong. I did give this some thought.
During the first industrial revolution, the affected nations moved from a rural economy, based on agriculture and trade, to an urban, industrialized, mechanized, simplified and, thus, overcrowded economy. In 1800 it was possible to have a sustained growth of wealth that allowed the transition to a wide use of innovative machines, especially in transport and work, abandoning animal traction and production based on manual labor.
During the second industrial revolution The exponential development of railways, while structuring a new model of international trade based on the specialized production of each country and the exchange of materials from standardized prices, also enabled huge migratory movements, like boiler boats that even transported large masses of people on intercontinental trips, as was the case of the 55 million Europeans who migrated to North America between 1850 and 1940.
The cause of the great migrations during the second industrial revolution was, mainly, the tremendous demographic growth that there was in Europe during the eighteenth century, which in turn had different causes.
Judicial Branch is where the interpret laws and constitution
His decision to buy the land went against his own belief to strictly follow the words of the Constitution.
<span>The Constitution gave no guidance about acquiring lands from other countries. Jefferson was going out on a limb with the Louisiana Purchase.</span>
