Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
A. Existence of social classes...Under capitalism those who collect another's funds in a voluntary transaction become rich (if they also run their business with a high enough profit margin) whereas under socialism: A "family" (like LBJ's and their Democrat FCC broadcast monopoly "licenses") is "granted" special privileges by the "rulers" and end up from nothing to the 100's of millions
Answer:
Executive Officers means the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Parent, and/or such other officers that may be agreed by the parties hereto after the date of this Agreement from time to time.
Explanation:
More that half of modern American farm products were grown by Native Americans before British colonization.
