1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rusak2 [61]
2 years ago
15

In what way might the Allies benefit from Germany’s decision to fight on two fronts?

History
2 answers:
Anika [276]2 years ago
4 0

Hitler has already controlled most Western-Central Europe when he decided also to fight against the URSS on the Eastern front. By that time, Germany had already conquered almost the whole France, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland, Czecoslovakia, etc.

The URSS and nazi Germany had signed a non-agression pact before WWII. Germany had conquered territories on the East until a Germany-URSS border was established. <u>When Hitler decided to attack this Eastern border, the URSS abandonned its neutral position and joined the allied forces against Hitler. </u>The allies benefited greatly from having on their side such a powerful help.

From this moment on, also due to the internvention of the US on the conflict, US and UK fought Germany on the Western Front while the URSS did the same on the Eastern front. <u>Germany had to divide its forces between two very powerful enemies located on each front and this led to its destruction. </u>

vredina [299]2 years ago
3 0
<span>The Allies might attack Germany on the French side because the Germans had no troops at that border.</span>
You might be interested in
If the majority of white southeners did not own slaves, why did the south remain so loyal to slavery
Gala2k [10]
Because the south in large part were built on slaves. They didn't have factories or anything like the north did. They had cotton and assorted vegetables. In large part many will say that is also what lost them the war.
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not true of political machines
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer: They served as a crude welfare system

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The constitution of the Confederate States of America closely resembled the U.S. Constitution. How was the Confederate constitut
asambeis [7]

Answer:

It stressed the independence of each state and guaranteed the protection of slavery.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Here are the questions.
finlep [7]

Answer:

1. b) The 14th amendment enabled the government to reinterpret the purpose and usage of the Bill of Rights.

2. c) The Supreme Court used incorporation because states were violating the Bill of Rights.

3. b) Incorporation binds states to the Bill of Rights rather than the Federal Government.

4. c) "When the 14th Amendment was ratified...., it placed limits on the kinds of laws states could pass"

5. d) The incorporation of the 14th amendment may not benefit all Americans equally.

Explanation:

  • The Supreme Court has only adopted certain Bill of Rights modifications. They haven't protected all rights against governmental intrusion, so they're not done. C explains the Supreme Court's incorporation, so it's the most correct. The Supreme Court successfully utilized incorporation to stop state Bill of Rights violations.
  • In general, incorporation has had a positive impact on American civil rights. As a result, it has ensured that both state and federal governments are held to the same standard in protecting the rights of individuals.
  • State and municipal governments were compelled to defend "most liberties included in the Bill of Rights" under the 14th Amendment, which was originally intended for recently freed slaves. There was no need that states comply by the constraints it put on the federal government, as stated above. All of this is accurate. There was a Supreme Court decision that had a major influence on our federalist system that is referenced in this quotation about incorporation. A state's power is limited when it comes to federally protected rights when it comes to enacting an unlawful legislation.
5 0
2 years ago
How did home rule affect the lives of the white people in the South?
lesya [120]

Answer:

The Home Rule was the period after Reconstruction, when the governments of the southern states of the country were reconstituted according to the popular will of their inhabitants, when until 1877 they were directly appointed by the federal government.

Thus, state governments began to establish measures designed to limit the civil and political liberties of African Americans, guaranteeing only whites access to all of their rights. Thus, Home Rule put conservative white Democrats back in a role of social superiority over the rest of the inhabitants of the southern states.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Janel is a traveler from 1350 BCE and is an adherent of hinduism a polytheistic religion which of the following places is most l
    11·2 answers
  • Anthropologists are social scientists who study the way people live.<br><br><br> True False
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Lincoln wait until 1862 to emancipate the slaves part of the war effort?
    13·1 answer
  • Based on your research, write a short essay of 250–300 words discussing the genocide you have chosen to study. Your essay should
    10·2 answers
  • Why were the Arabs able to conquer territory quickly.
    13·2 answers
  • Please help me in 3 &amp; 4 !!
    14·1 answer
  • How did Britain view the victory against the Spanish Armada ?
    7·1 answer
  • Holocaust review<br><br> Create a plan to help Holocaust survivors reconstruct their lives.
    6·1 answer
  • Based on this primary source document, do you think Jefferson would support or be against the concept of manifest destiny and th
    8·1 answer
  • Match the following description to the correct person. "Wisconsin
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!