Answer:
a. you mustn't stop here.
b. you don't have to eat meat.
C. they mustn't cut the rope.
d. she don't have to be quiet.
E. mike don't have to go to the doctor.
f. Derek and Steve mustn't attend church.
Answer:
C
Explanation: This is the only answer that explains exactly what the essay is about. A and D only talk about one branch, not all three. If you use A or D as a topic sentence the reader will think the essay is only about one branch. B talks about the different names of the federal government , not the branches themselves which may lead the reader to think that the essay is about the different names of the federal government.
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
Please give me brainliest
<span>semantic fallacy
</span>
A “slam dunk” argument is likely the product of a fallacious syllogism. The word “slam dunk” has actually originated from the basketball games. This word is used to show people a forceful move in the game of basketball. The player puts the ball in the basket with full power and force. It is often considered a dramatic shot in the game. In literary sense, the word can be used to express violent actions as well. It can also be used to describe a vicious fight among individuals. <span> </span>
The correct answer would be choice A) or the first option.
