1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yanka [14]
3 years ago
8

(1) Scientists generally agree that Earth is getting warmer due to what's called the greenhouse effect. (2) A greenhouse stays w

arm because sunlight and heat coming through the glass roof are mostly trapped. (3) The heat doesn't radiate back into the atmosphere because it's held in by the glass. (4) Something like that happens on Earth. (5) The atmosphere acts like a blanket that keeps the Sun's heat from leaking away into space. What is the main conclusion you are to draw from this paragraph? A. The sun's heat can easily leak away out into space. B. The greenhouse effect is changing Earth's atmosphere. C. The atmosphere is what keeps the planet warm. D. Greenhouses help most plants to grow more quickly.
English
2 answers:
irinina [24]3 years ago
8 0
I agree with the person above - I'd say the correct answer is B. The greenhouse effect is changing Earth's atmosphere.
A is incorrect because the excerpt says that the atmosphere keeps the Sun's heat from leaking away into space. C is incorrect because it is the greenhouse effect that keeps the planet warm. D is not even mentioned in the text, which means that only B is correct.
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
4 0
I believe the answer is B! Hope this helps and You're Welcome! :3
You might be interested in
The health benefits of tea have been the subject of much research; in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibitin
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

E). Besides possibly preventing or inhibiting.

Explanation:

As per the question, <u>option E most appropriately revises the underlined phrase as it is both syntactically and semantically appropriate</u>. The other options are either grammatically inappropriate(parallelism error in options  A, B, and C(because 'it is singular while 'forms' is plural' that creates a discrepancy) or lexical error(option D conveys an inadequate meaning due to wrong use of 'and' between the two participles). Therefore, <u>option E</u> only conveys the clear, concise, and grammatically appropriate meaning because it appropriately states that 'the health benefits of tea have become a subject to research; besides possible preventing or inhibiting some forms of cancer,....stroke.'

8 0
3 years ago
What mood does the setting of "The Raven" create? PLZ PLZ PLZ PLZ PLZ HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST ANSWER
nika2105 [10]
B. haunting hope this helps


7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Helpppp asaapppppp!!!
Fiesta28 [93]
Characters and theme
7 0
3 years ago
Who is the villain of The Bracelet​
natulia [17]

Answer:

ummmm............, electric family

6 0
3 years ago
In a few paragraphs compare and contrast two books (can be any book) using transition words.
seropon [69]
Books compared: The Boy in the Striped Pajamas & Making Bombs for Hitler.

(These two books are similar but have some notable differences which is what makes them great for a comparison.)

Here are the paragraphs:

The two books that I will be comparing are “Making Bombs for Hitler” by Marsha Skrypuch and The Boy in the Striped Pajamas by John Boyne. Both of these stories center around a child’s perspective in World War II. “Making Bombs for Hitler” is a story centered around a young Ukrainian girl named Lida. Lida is not Jewish, but she still faces hardships from both the Nazis and the Soviets. After losing her family, Lida is sent to a work camp since she lied about her age. Lida had proven to be a hard worker, so she received a new work task- a top secret operation. Lida had to make bombs for Hitler and the Nazis. “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is also about a young child faced with World War II hardships. Eight year old Bruno moves to a new town because of his father’s job promotion. Bruno’s father is a very important member of the Nazi party, and Bruno is sure that one day he will be to. After moving into their new house, Bruno has a lot of free time. He decides to take a walk around his new property, where he meets his new friend Shmuel. But, little did Bruno know that Shmuel was a Jewish boy in a concentration camp. What happens next is tragic.

These two books have many similarities. For starters, both books have very similar settings. Both of the stories take place in Europe during World War II. Another similarity is that in both stories, a child is the protagonist. Both Lida and Bruno are eight years old. The next similarity that I found present in both stories is that the protagonist is both stories is also not Jewish. Bruno’s father is a Nazi and Lida is presumably Catholic (since she has a cross necklace.) And lastly, in both stories, both Lida and Bruno befriend a Jewish person. Bruno befriends Shmuel, which makes up the overall storyline of the book. And Lida befriends a Jewish girl named Zenia. So, the overall atmosphere of both stories, the plot details, and the two major protagonists are all similar.

Although the stories do have a lot of general similarities, they also have a lot of differences too. One of the biggest differences in the book is the main character’s situation. Other than the danger that Bruno puts himself in, Bruno is safe. He is not in a work or concentration camp, and he has the Nazi Party’s protection. Whereas, Lida is in great danger. The Nazi party is against her, and they are the reason why she is in a work camp. Everyday Lida experiences torturous conditions, while all of Bruno’s danger is self inflicted. Another difference between the two is that Bruno had his family. He lived with his father, his mother, and his older sister. Lida, however, lost all of her family because of the war. The only family member that Lida had was her sister, and then they were separated. The final difference in these two stories is the ending. In the ending of “Making Bombs for Hitler” everything turns out okay for Lida. She is rescued by an American soldier, and she receives a letter from her sister. Where as in comparison, the ending of “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is heartbreaking. Simply stated, no one gets a happy ending. The endings even signify different meanings, in that “Making Bombs for Hitler’s” ending inspires hope and new beginnings, while “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” ending signified grief and then end of something good.


*Please make sure that you change some words if you chose to use this.*

And if this helped, please mark it brainliest. Hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In literature, the reason why a character says or does something is called a(n) _____.
    12·1 answer
  • Correct this sentence:<br><br> When choosing courses for the next semester.
    14·1 answer
  • What is a negative consequence of using euphemism?
    15·1 answer
  • Which choice explains one possible way to correct a dependent clause​ fragment?
    8·1 answer
  • Which best identifies a similiarity between third-person limited and third-person omniscient points of view?
    8·2 answers
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP WRITE ME A SIMILE POEM PLZZZZ
    6·2 answers
  • in the book Anne Frank, the members of the secret annex club tend to get on each other's nerves, why?
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone help me please
    5·2 answers
  • Cognitive development place in the correct sequence
    15·1 answer
  • Passage
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!