You are working on a research project in which you must present a short documentary film about the history of your family. Which
of the following sources would be considered most credible for this project? The New York Times article on the history of Ellis Island and immigration
Hand-written letters from your great-great grandmother about her immigration
A story in People Magazine about the importance of family connections
The Wikipedia entry on genealogy and the role of genes in one’s family
If you are working on a research project in which you must present a short documentary film about the history of your family, the source that would be considered most credible for this project is hand-written letters from your great-great grandmother about her immigration. You will get the most information from her letters.
If you are working on a research project in which you must present a short documentary film about the history of your family, The source that would be considered most credible for this project is option B.
Hand-written letters from your great-great grandmother about her immigration.
Those letters will provide too much significant and useful information, data and description pertaining to the history of your family, Every source that comes from any member of the family, especially ancestor will add reliable, credible and accurate proves to what you are going to present in your documentary.
I would say that the passage which best suggests an indirect cause is B) Jack slew the giant because he sold the cow for magic beans. Him selling the cow wasn't the direct cause for him killing the giant, but it happened indirectly.
