Being an alchemist is the answer to this question
Answer:
Explanation:
A series of Parliamentary Acts from 1763–1774 contributed to rising colonial unrest, culminating in the outbreak of the Revolutionary War.
For starters, the Commercial Revolution was a period of European economic expansion, which began in the 16th century. The catalyst for this expansion was Europe's discovery and colonization of the Americas. As trade routes grew between the New World colonies and Old World Europe, the European continent was transformed.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Here we are talking about the Treaty of Paris that was signed to officially end World War I.
Some historians and scholars have criticized the terms of the Treaty of Paris and called it unfair or excessive.
But these critics only show a lack of understanding of the problems facing the peacemakers in 1919-20. And the problems were considerable.
Diplomats and politicians who attended the peace agreement had to evaluate many circumstances when working out the details of the treaty. It was not an easy task for them.
US President Wilson had already presented its famous "14 Points Plan" but was rejected by the European allies. The reason was simple. European allies such as France and England did not really want a peace plan that benefited all. No. They wanted retribution. And for these countries, there was only one nation to blame. And they wanted revenge and severe punishment for the pain and destruction caused by Germans during the war. That is how Germany had to pay for war reparations.
However, everybody knows what happened next.
After the failure of teh Weimar Republic, the advent of Adolph Hitler and another generation of belic Germans got to power and they indeed wanted revenge. And the world started to fear the worst...WOrld War II was about to begin.
Answer:
I don't agree with his policy because by excluding the Anglo-Saxon nobility he created and opportunity that they would revolt against him as he didn't provide them any benefits that they enjoyed before. Therefore, I believe that politically this was a wrong move.
On the other side, it was also economically wrong move, as those people were acquainted with peasantry and other members of lower social layers and they could make them accept the new ruling class more easier.
Explanation:
William was a great conqueror, but some of the political decisions he brought weren't very prudent.
He didn't create unity in the country, as the Normans were much more respected than the descendants of Anglo-Saxons.
This policy also affected his successors.