They did think about kids when they wore this amendment they thought about menSo they did think about kids and women.
The answer would be B !!!!
It was the "c. principle of popular sovereignty" that both the State constitutions and the Articles of Confederation had in common, since both these documents put a strong emphasis on the people being able to choose their representatives.
1. After approval by Congress, it had a deadline for state ratification of seven years, and was considered a low priority amongst the turmoil of the 1970s.
<span>2. It was largely pointless. Every state already has some recognition of equal rights for the both sexes in its constitution or statutes, and a body of caselaw supporting the same. Many state legislatures were wary of ratifying an amendment that would expand federal power without really accomplishing anything.</span>
